Comparative study of left vertebral artery revascularization in patients with and without aberrant left vertebral anatomy.

OBJECTIVE: Left vertebral artery revascularization is indicated in surgery involving zone 2 of the aortic arch and is typically accomplished indirectly via subclavian artery revascularization. For aberrant left vertebral anatomy, direct revascularization is indicated. Our objective was to compare the outcomes of direct vertebral artery revascularization with indirect subclavian artery revascularization for treating aortic arch pathology and to identify predictors of mortality. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary hospital, including patients who underwent open or endovascular vertebral artery revascularization from 2005 to 2022. Those who underwent direct vertebral revascularization were compared with those who were indirectly revascularized via subclavian artery revascularization. The outcomes of interest were a composite outcome (any of death, stroke, nerve injury, and thrombosis) and mortality. Univariate logistic regression models were fitted to quantify the strength of differences between the direct and indirect revascularization cohorts. Cox regression was used to identify mortality predictors. RESULTS: Of 143 patients who underwent vertebral artery revascularization, 21 (14.7%) had a vertebral artery originating from the aortic arch. The median length of stay was 10 days (interquartile range, 6-20 days), and demographics were similar between cohorts. The incidence of composite outcome, bypass thrombosis, and hoarseness was significantly higher in the direct group (42.9% vs 18.0%, P = .019; 33.3% vs 0.8%, P < .0001; 57.1% vs 18.0%, P < .001, respectively). The direct group was approximately three times more likely to experience the composite outcome (odds ratio, 3.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.28, 9.08); similarly, this group was approximately six times more likely to have hoarseness (odds ratio, 5.88; 95% confidence interval, 2.21, 15.62). There was no significant difference in mortality rates at 30 days, 1, 3, 5, and 10 years of follow-up. Age, length of hospital stay, and congestive heart failure were identified as predictors of higher mortality. After adjusting for these covariates, the group itself was not an independent predictor of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Direct vertebral revascularization was associated with higher rates of composite outcome (death, stroke, nerve injury, and thrombosis), bypass thrombosis and hoarseness. Patients with aberrant vertebral anatomy are at higher risks of these complications compared with patients with standard arch anatomy. However, after adjusting for other factors, mortality rates were not significantly different between the groups.

Surgical management of intravenous leiomyomatosis with intracardiac extension.

Intravenous leiomyomatosis is a rare smooth muscle tumor that is associated with uterine leiomyomas. Intravenous leiomyomatosis often presents with nonspecific abdominal and cardiac symptoms, making the diagnosis difficult. We present a comprehensive review of a case of a 52-year-old woman with intravenous leiomyomatosis with intracardiac extension, who was successfully treated with complete surgical resection.

A comparison of outcomes between open and endovascular arteriovenous access creation for hemodialysis.

OBJECTIVE: Preliminary outcomes for percutaneous endovascular autogenous access (endoAVF) have shown promising results; however, comparisons with surgical cohorts in dialysis populations are lacking. This study compares autogenous arteriovenous access created with the EverlinQ endoAVF system with accesses created by conventional surgical technique with respect to functional and patency related outcomes. METHODS: This is a multicenter, retrospective review of autogenous arteriovenous accesses entered into a prospective database. Patients receiving radiocephalic, brachiocephalic, or endoAVF arteriovenous accesses between 2014 and 2019 were included. Autogenous access maturation, primary patency, secondary patency, steal syndrome, and reinterventions were collected and analyzed using standard statistical and survival analyses. RESULTS: A total of 369 accesses were created during the study period, including 61 endovascular accesses, 171 radiocephalic accesses, and 137 brachiocephalic accesses (median follow-up, 17 months; range, 1-71 months). Maturation failure at the end of follow-up was 27% ± 6%, 27% ± 5%, and 18% ± 4% for endovascular, radiocephalic, and brachiocephalic accesses, respectively (P = .049 for brachiocephalic vs endovascular accesses). Primary patencies at 12 and 24 months were 42% ± 5% and 32% ± 7% for endovascular accesses, 43% ± 4% and 24% ± 4% for radiocephalic accesses, and 42% ± 4% and 29% ± 4% for brachiocephalic accesses (P = .906). Secondary patencies at 12 and 24 months were 68% ± 6% and 60% ± 7% for endovascular accesses, 75% ± 3% and 67% ± 4% for radiocephalic accesses, and 91% ± 3% and 81% ± 4% for brachiocephalic accesses (P = .006 for brachiocephalic vs endovascular accesses). There were no statistically significant differences in ischemic steal syndrome (3.3%, 4.1%, and 8.0%; P = .229) or total reinterventions/year (1.0 ± 3.1, 0.9 ± 1.8, and 1.2 ± 1.8; P = .289) for endovascular, radiocephalic, or brachiocephalic arteriovenous accesses, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: EndoAVF compare favorably with respect to maturation and patency compared with surgically created accesses in a real-world cohort. Outcomes and reintervention rates are similar to conventional radiocephalic arteriovenous accesses, but are inferior with respect to patency and maturation to brachiocephalic accesses.

Influence of artery and vein diameters on autogenous arteriovenous access patency.

OBJECTIVE: Previous investigations have suggested that a minimum venous outflow diameter (MVOD) and perianastomotic arterial diameter are associated with successful autogenous arteriovenous maturation and patency. The goal of this study was to determine anatomic and clinical variables that may influence access patency to guide optimal autogenous access configuration selection. METHODS: Accesses created from 2010 to 2016 were analyzed from data entered into a prospective database. Preprocedure duplex ultrasound mapping data of artery and tourniquet-derived vein diameters and demographic and clinical variables were collected. Survival-based cut point analysis was used to determine anatomic parameters most predictive of access failure. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to assess patencies and maturation and to identify independent predictors of access failure. RESULTS: A total of 356 first-time autogenous accesses were created (median follow-up, 20 months; range, 0-73 months). Of these, 202 (56.7%) were radiocephalic and 154 (43.3%) were brachiocephalic. Maturation failure at end of follow-up for arteriovenous accesses was 26% ± 3% for radiocephalic accesses and 15% ± 3% for brachiocephalic accesses (P < .001). For radiocephalic accesses, MVOD <3.0 mm and radial artery diameter <2.1 mm independently predicted access maturation failure (MVOD <3.0 mm: hazard ratio [HR], 2.62 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.27-5.39; P = .009]; radial artery diameter <2.1 mm: HR, 2.20 [95% CI, 1.20-4.05; P = .011]) and secondary patency loss (MVOD <3.0 mm: HR, 2.21 [95% CI, 1.24-3.96; P = .007]; radial artery diameter <2.1 mm: HR, 2.11 [95% CI, 1.26-3.63; P = .004]). A combination of radial artery diameter <2.1 mm and MVOD <3.0 mm most strongly predicted maturation failure (HR, 4.24; 95% CI, 1.71-10.49; P = .002) and loss of secondary patency (HR, 4.03; 95% CI, 1.88-8.64; P < .001). Only diabetes mellitus (HR, 2.24; P = .012) predicted secondary patency loss. For brachiocephalic accesses, MVOD <3.4 mm (HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.02-4.46; P = .043) was found to independently predict secondary patency loss in addition to previous ipsilateral (HR, 2.37; P = .038) and bilateral (HR, 4.00; P = .015) tunneled hemodialysis catheters. Brachial artery diameter was not associated with either access maturation or patency. CONCLUSIONS: Artery and tourniquet-derived vein diameters independently predict radiocephalic access patency and functional outcomes. A combination of a radial artery diameter <2.1 mm and MVOD <3.0 mm best predicts maturation failure and patency loss for radiocephalic access. MVOD <3.4 mm was associated with increased loss of brachiocephalic access secondary patency, but MVOD was not associated with maturation.

Cost-minimization study of the percutaneous approach to endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous access for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (P-EVAR) is less invasive compared with surgical access for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (S-EVAR). P-EVAR has been associated with shorter recovery and fewer wound complications. However, vascular closure devices (VCDs) are costly, and the economic effects of P-EVAR have important implications for resource allocation. The objective of our study was to estimate the differences in the costs between P-EVAR and S-EVAR. METHODS: We used a decision tree to analyze the costs from a payer perspective throughout the course of the index hospitalization. The probabilities, relative risks, and mean difference summary measures were obtained from a systematic review and meta-analysis. We modelled differences in surgical site infection, lymphocele, and the length of hospitalization. Cost parameters were derived from the 2014 National Inpatient Sample using "International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification" codes. Attributable costs were estimated using generalized linear models adjusted by age, sex, and comorbidities. A sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the robustness of the results. RESULTS: A total of 6876 abdominal and thoracic EVARs were identified. P-EVAR resulted in a mean cost savings of $751 per procedure. The mean costs for P-EVAR were $1287 (95% confidence interval [CI], $884-$1835) and for S-EVAR were $2038 (95% CI, $757-$4280). P-EVAR procedures were converted to open procedures in 4.3% of the cases. The P-EVAR patients had a difference of -1.4 days (95% CI, -0.12 to -2.68) in the length of hospitalization at a cost of $1190/d (standard error, $298). The cost savings of P-EVAR was primarily driven by the cost differences in the length of hospitalization. In the base case, four VCDs were used per P-EVAR at $200/device. In the two-way sensitivity analysis, P-EVAR resulted in cost savings, even when 1.5 times more VCDs had been used per procedure and the cost of each VCD was 1.5 times greater. In our probabilistic sensitivity analysis, P-EVAR was the cost savings strategy for 82.6% of 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations when simultaneously varying parameters across their uncertainty ranges. CONCLUSIONS: P-EVAR had lower costs compared with S-EVAR and could result in dramatic cost savings if extrapolated to the number of aortic aneurysms repaired. Our analysis was a conservative estimate that did not account for the improved quality of life after P-EVAR.

Outcomes of a Spinal Drain and Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring Protocol in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

BACKGROUND: Adjuncts for early detection and treatment of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) in thoracic aortic surgery are supported by robust clinical experience in open repair. The utility of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage and neurophysiologic monitoring (NPM) in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is less clear. The purpose of this investigation is to determine the influence of a selective institutional spinal cord protection protocol using prophylactic NPM and CSF on outcomes for standard TEVAR. METHODS: Patients undergoing standard TEVAR entered into a prospectively maintained database from a single institution from 2007 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative characteristics, aneurysm extent, and etiology were reviewed. Utilization of CSF drains including volume of fluid removed, duration of drainage, and catheter-related complications were collected. NPM data were reviewed to determine the influence on intraoperative management. Exact logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of SCI. RESULTS: Of 223 patients undergoing TEVAR, 130 met inclusion criteria for the study. CSF drains were used in 71 patients (54.6%), and 56 of 130 (43%) had NPM. SCI occurred in 7 patients (5.4%), of whom 5 had partial or complete recovery. Median time to symptoms of SCI was delayed in all cases (median 52 hr, range 8-312), and none of the 4 of 7 patients with adjunct NPM demonstrated intraoperative changes. Intraoperative changes in NPM occurred in 26 (46%), and represented unilateral leg ischemia in all but 2 cases. In both patients, changes consistent with SCI were associated with intraoperative hypotension and resolved with blood pressure augmentation. Neither patient developed postoperative SCI. Median length of stay (22 vs. 9 days, P = 0.012), operative room time (262 vs. 209, P = 0.040), and perioperative mortality (28.6% vs. 4.1%, P = 0.046) were significantly higher for patients with SCI versus those without. Length of aortic coverage was found to be the sole independent predictor of SCI (odds ratio 8.2, P = 0.026). Complications related to CSF drainage occurred in 4 patients (5.6%) with major complications occurring in 2 patients (2.8%), including 1 with an intrathecal hematoma and permanent bilateral paraparesis. CONCLUSIONS: Selective use of prophylactic CSF drainage in TEVAR was associated with moderate risk and questionable benefit. The use of neurophysiological monitoring allowed for early detection and treatment of spinal ischemia, but its utility is limited by logistical factors and to the minority of patients with intraoperative spinal ischemic events.

An age-based comparison of fistula location, patency, and maturation for elderly renal failure patients.

OBJECTIVE: Current Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines do not incorporate age in determining autogenous arteriovenous hemodialysis access placement, and the optimal initial configuration in elderly patients remains controversial. We compared patency, maturation, survival, and complications between several age cohorts (<65 years, 65-79 years, >80 years) to determine whether protocols should be modified to account for advanced age. METHODS: All patients at two teaching hospitals undergoing a first autogenous arteriovenous access creation in either arm between 2007 and 2013 were retrospectively analyzed from a prospectively maintained database. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox hazards models were used to compare access patency and risk factors for failure. RESULTS: There were 941 autogenous arteriovenous accesses (median follow-up, 23 months; range, 0-89 months) eligible for inclusion; 152 (15.3%) accesses were created in those >80 years, 397 (42.2%) in those 65 to 79 years, and 392 (41.8%) in those <65 years. Primary patencies in patients >80 years, 65 to 79 years, and <65 years were 40% ± 4%, 38% ± 3%, and 51% ± 3% at 12 months and 12% ± 5%, 13% ± 3%, and 27% ± 3% at 36 months (P < .001). Primary assisted patencies were 72% ± 4%, 70% ± 2%, and 78% ± 2% at 12 months and 52% ± 5%, 52% ± 3%, and 67% ± 3% at 36 months (P < .001). Secondary patencies were 72% ± 4%, 71% ± 2%, and 79% ± 2% at 12 months and 54% ± 5%, 55% ± 3%, and 72% ± 3% at 36 months (P < .001). Radiocephalic patencies were lowest among older cohorts; in those >80 years, 65 to 79 years, and <65 years, they were 65% ± 7%, 67% ± 4%, and 77% ± 3% at 12 months and 41% ± 8%, 51% ± 5%, and 68% ± 4% at 36 months (P = .019). Secondary brachiocephalic access patencies in these cohorts were 78% ± 5%, 80% ± 3%, and 82% ± 3% at 12 months and 68% ± 7%, 66% ± 5%, and 77% ± 4% at 36 months (P = .206). Both the age groups 65 to 79 years and >80 years demonstrated superior brachiocephalic vs radiocephalic secondary patencies (P = .048 and P = .015, respectively); however, no differences between configuration and secondary patency were observed within the cohort <65 years. Radiocephalic access maturation failure at 12 and 24 months was 25% ± 3% and 29% ± 4% in those <65 years, 32% ± 3% and 39% ± 4% in those 65 to 79 years, and 40% ± 7% and 48% ± 8% in those >80 years (P = .006). Brachiocephalic access maturation failures were 17% ± 3% and 20% ± 3% at 12 and 24 months in those <65 years, 21% ± 3% and 25% ± 4% in those 65 to 79 years, and 18% ± 5% and 21% ± 5% in those >80 years (P = .740). On multivariate analysis, coronary disease, female sex, previous ipsilateral or bilateral catheters, radiocephalic configuration, and age >65 years were associated with secondary patency loss. CONCLUSIONS: Patients aged 65 to 79 years and >80 years had inferior primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency and maturation compared with those <65 years. When stratified by configuration, radiocephalic accesses demonstrated lower patency and maturation compared with brachiocephalic accesses for patients aged 65 to 79 years and >80 years and were an independent predictor of secondary patency loss.

Minimally Invasive Techniques for Total Aortic Arch Reconstruction.

The cumulative experience with endovascular aortic repair in the descending thoracic and infrarenal aorta has led to increased interest in endovascular aortic arch reconstruction. Open total arch replacement is a robust operation that can be performed with excellent results. However, it requires cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest and, therefore, may not be tolerated by all patients. Minimally invasive techniques have been considered as an alternative and include hybrid arch debranching, parallel stent graft deployment in the chimney and snorkel configurations, and complete endovascular branched reconstruction with multi-branched devices. This review discusses the evolving use of endovascular techniques in the management of aortic arch pathology and considers their relevance in an era of safe and durable open aortic arch reconstruction.

Socioeconomic and geographic disparities in access to endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: Within Southwestern Ontario, abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery has been centralized to a single university-affiliated medical center. The referral area serves 1.9 million people and includes community hospitals with limited vascular surgery capabilities. We reviewed the role of patients' travel distance, geographic location, and socioeconomic status (SES) to determine if centralization of endovascular programs results in disparity in access to endovascular surgery. We hypothesized that patients would travel a longer distance to specifically seek elective endovascular surgery while having open and emergent surgery closer to home. METHODS: All patients who underwent AAA repair (July 2005-June 2010) at London Health Science Centre were identified from the vascular surgery database. Method of repair, clinical presentation, and in-hospital mortality were recorded. Travel distance from each patient's home to our hospital and rural versus urban status was determined for each patient. SES was determined by using a previously validated, locally developed deprivation index. RESULTS: During this 5-year period, 1,243 patients were included in our analysis; 46.8% (n=581) underwent endovascular repair (EVAR) and 53.2% (n=662) underwent open repair. For elective cases, the in-hospital mortality rate was 2.0% (n=11) for EVAR and 3.6% (n=20) for open repair (P=0.1). There was no difference in clinical presentation between SES groups, but open repair was more frequently used in patients of lower SES compared to higher SES (odds ratio=1.32; 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.72). Travel distance and rural/urban status were not associated with increased odds of EVAR. When ruptured aneurysms were excluded, elective patients of lower SES continued to have a higher rate of open surgery. CONCLUSION: Despite the centralization of endovascular programs in Canada, patients do not appear to be traveling a longer distance for EVAR while having open repairs closer to home as we expected. We did note that higher SES was associated with increased odds of EVAR, which may suggest a health care access bias for EVAR for patients of higher SES. Larger, population-based studies at the provincial or national level could confirm these initial findings.

Differences between referred and nonreferred patients in cancer research.

BACKGROUND: In Canada, provincial cancer registries have been established to provide rigorous population-based data for patients with colorectal cancer. Databases maintained by regional cancer agencies contain a broader scope of information and have been used as a surrogate source of information for colorectal cancer research. It is unclear whether these data can be reliably extrapolated to all patients affected by colorectal cancer. We sought to determine whether patients included in a referral-based database are systematically different from patients who are not included. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare patients referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency with those who were not referred. Comparison was based on age, sex and geographic location. We used univariate and logistic regression analysis to identify significant differences between the cohorts. RESULTS: Univariate analysis demonstrated that the referral and nonreferral cohorts differed in sex, age and geographic location. For patients with rectal cancer, the referral and nonreferral cohorts varied in age and geographic location. Multivariate analysis demonstrated significant differences in age and geographic location but not sex for patients with colon and rectal cancer. CONCLUSION: Patients included in the referral database differed in age and geographic location from those included only in the provincial database. Studies using large data sets from referral centres must be interpreted with caution and may not be representative of the entire patient population.

CONTEXTE: Au Canada, on a établi des registres provinciaux en oncologie pour générer des données représentatives rigoureuses au sujet des patients atteints de cancer colorectal. Les bases de données maintenues par les agences régionales du cancer contiennent un éventail plus large de renseignements et ont servi de source de données de substitution pour la recherche sur le cancer colorectal. Or, on ignore s'il est possible d'extrapoler ces données de manière fiable à tous les patients atteints de cancer colorectal. Nous avons voulu déterminer si les patients inclus dans une base de données de référence sont systématiquement différents des patients qui n'y figurent pas. MÉTHODES: Nous avons procédé à une étude de cohorte rétrospective pour comparer les patients référés à l'agence de lutte contre le cancer de la Colombie-Britanniqueà ceux qui n'y avaient pas été référés. La comparaison reposait sur l'âge, le sexe et l'emplacement géographique. Nous avons utilisé une analyse de régression univariée et logistique pour dégager les différences significatives entre les cohortes. RÉSULTATS: L'analyse univariée a démontré que les cohortes référée et non référée différaient aux plans du sexe, de l'âge et de l'emplacement géographique. Pour les patients atteints d'un cancer rectal, les cohortes référée et non référée variaient selon l'âge et l'emplacement géographique. L'analyse multivariée a révélé des différences significatives aux plans de l'âge et de l'emplacement géographique, mais non au plan du sexe en ce qui concerne les patients atteints de cancer du côlon et du rectum. CONCLUSION: Les patients inclus dans la base de données de référence étaient différents de ceux qui ne figuraient que dans la base de données provinciale, pour ce qui est de l'âge et de l'emplacement géographique. Il faut interpréter avec prudence lesétudes reposant sur d'importantes séries de données provenant de centres de référence, car elles pourraient ne pas être représentatives de toute la population de patients.

Hepatic artery transection reconstructed with splenic artery transposition graft.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatic artery transection presents a technical challenge in vascular reconstruction. Formal arterial repair is indicated in patients with underlying liver disease and those undergoing bile duct reconstructions because of a higher risk of complication following hepatic artery injury. This report highlights a novel approach to hepatic artery transection with splenic artery transposition. METHODS: A case of hepatic artery transection repaired with splenic artery transposition is presented with an accompanying literature review. RESULTS: During elective pancreaticoduodenectomy, the common hepatic artery was injured at its origin. The splenic artery was divided and transposed to the hepatic artery, thus restoring arterial flow to the liver and bile duct. CONCLUSION: Various strategies to manage a hepatic artery injury have been described, ranging from ligation to complex vascular reconstruction. In hemodynamically stable patients, arterial transposition using the splenic artery is a feasible method to ensure adequate arterial supply to the liver and biliary tract.

Planned ilioinguinal nerve excision for prevention of chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia repair is a common operative procedure, but the development of chronic postoperative pain is a dreaded potential complication. The role of neurectomy in decreasing the incidence of chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair is currently unknown. Our objective was to determine whether a planned ilioinguinal nerve excision results in a decrease in the development of chronic pain experienced after inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: A systematic literature review was carried out to identify studies investigating the influence of ilioinguinal nerve excision on the development of chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. A quantitative analysis of the pooled data was carried out. RESULTS: Of 6,023 abstracts reviewed, 4 high-quality, randomized-controlled trials were identified. The pooled mean difference in degree of pain at 6 months postoperatively on a 10-point scale was -0.29 (95% confidence interval: -0.48 to -0.11), favoring neurectomy to decrease the chance of developing chronic pain. Not surprisingly, those individuals undergoing neurectomy were also more likely to develop altered sensation at the same time point (odds ratio: 3.70, 95% confidence interval: 2.61-5.25). CONCLUSION: A planned resection of the ilioinguinal nerve at the time of inguinal hernia repair is associated with a decrease in the incidence of chronic postoperative pain. Thus, carrying out this simple maneuver at the time of operation might decrease a major source of postoperative patient morbidity.

Technical report of a novel surgical technique: laparoscopic cyst fenestration and falciform ligament pedicle graft for treatment of symptomatic simple hepatic cysts.

BACKGROUND: Simple hepatic cysts are common and infrequently develop into large symptomatic cysts that require surgical therapy. These benign cysts have been shown to be amenable to minimally invasive surgery; however, recurrences of symptoms have been reported. Our experience with over 200 simple hepatic cysts has lead to the development of a novel therapy to resolve symptoms associated with large simple hepatic cysts and reduce the rate of recurrent symptoms. METHODS: An observational study demonstrating our experience with a novel minimally invasive technique for the management of symptomatic simple hepatic cyst. RESULTS: A total of 6 cases were identified where laparoscopic mini-fenestration and placement of a falciform pedicle graft was used. There were no operative complications and 4 of 6 patients were discharged home the day of surgery. With mean follow-up of 9.6 months, there has not been any recurrence to date. One patient required an open hepatic resection for the treatment of a cystadenoma. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic mini-fenestration and placement of a falciform ligament pedicle graft shows promising early results as a treatment for the simple hepatic cyst. Long term follow-up data is required.